The Oppressive Oppressed

In California, a century of traffic science and public-safety research had established strict licensing rules for truck drivers navigating fully loaded 80,000-pound, double-trailer behemoths amid tiny subcompacts on our busy freeways.

Our legal system has insisted that drivers of such interstate semis must be highly skilled and certified before stepping into the potentially dangerous T. Rex of a big rig. They must be 21, possess a valid California driver’s license, pass a Department of Transportation physical, and undergo background and drug screening—all before scoring 80 percent on a required 50-question technical exam, followed by a thorough two-hour, in-person test of their driving skills. Sounds great—in theory.

But not in fact. For fear that someone, somewhere, somehow at some time might be inconvenienced by these rules to protect the public, nearly 20,000 illegal aliens obtained commercial driver’s licenses from a compliant state of California without even proving rudimentary knowledge of English. They were free to exploit loopholes, leverage exemptions, and avoid background checks.

The result?

Our new leftist apparat empowered thousands of incompetent drivers. Many cannot distinguish a yield sign from a stop sign, and most cannot read a word of English. They drive as they please—racing, swerving, and veering, with a 40-ton trailer wagging behind them.

They now own our Wild West freeways so that our elite can feel morally superior to the mere lab-rat drivers on whom they experiment. The architects of these laws are often chauffeured in large limousines, SUVs, and motorcades or prefer to fly in private jets.

Western civilization mostly phased out public executions nearly a century ago. But before it congratulates itself on its distance from the medieval world, consider that the therapeutic Left now canonizes, rather than hangs, murderers. (Which is more medieval: to hang a murderer or to romanticize a known assassin?)

Luigi Mangione assassinated Brian Robert Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, in a December 2024 ambush and pleaded guilty to federal charges stemming from the killing this month. He has been deified by scores of young leftist women who swoon over the trust-fund scion’s good looks and politically correct violence. Indeed, admirers even produced a musical about his supposedly heroic murder of the health care executive.

Charlie Kirk was grotesquely murdered during a livestreamed public event, after which, for months on end, some on the Left celebrated his shooting and mocked those who mourned him. When Lindsay Clancy brutally strangled her three small children with an exercise band, women on the Left did not merely cite her supposedly extenuating postpartum depression but deified her as a victimized “everywoman”—with scarcely a voice for the three young lives snuffed out before they had a chance to grow up by the person who, until recently, everyone understood was supposed to care for them most: their mother.

The new secular revolutionaries know that their city upon a hill won’t work—and will crash and burn—if conservatives likewise deify the murderer of a populist Marxist podcaster. What would they do if conservatives, in tit-for-tat fashion, were to join in to gush over the handsome killer of a popular socialist activist? What if a returning combat veteran slew all his children and then developed a cult of admirers demanding his PTSD guaranteed him an exemption from the law? What if the Secret Service, on four separate occasions, had to shoot at would-be right-wing assassins of Obama?

Modern, sophisticated, humane science now has the technology to save most premature babies at 23–24 weeks. But in pre-civilizational fashion, Massachusetts—to the cheers of “enlightened” feminists—has enacted laws to allow abortion (involving the collapse of the infant’s skull and the siphoning out of its contents) right up to the moment of birth. The media hailed this license to kill a viable infant as “strengthening abortion care.”

In this brutal juxtaposition of life and death, modern and ancient, we invest millions to save one premature infant of six months, only to allot a few dollars to kill a baby as it looks out the birth canal and almost reaches a new life.

Chic Barbarity

These contradictions and alternate universes of the modern medieval West are still quite different from their counterparts in the medieval world of 500–1400.

At least the medieval age believed that it was incrementally gaining knowledge to fight age-old terrors of the human and natural worlds. And such progress would eventually lead to the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and the current affluence and freedom of the West.

In contrast, our retrograde contemporary world knows how to prevent ancient diseases. We have mastered the science of sewage control and treatment. We have sought to regulate away most of the dangers posed by life-giving machines. A hundred years of penal science has established that police visibility and law enforcement deter crime.

Yet reactionary Marxism, socialist-mandated equality, and authoritarian, heaven-on-earth utopianism—going beyond even the excesses of the medieval Church—war against the progress of civilization. These ideologies arise not from fear of God or of violating ancient customs and traditions, but from smug moral narcissism—with the addendum that our atheist saints must never suffer the consequences of their destructive ideology.

After all, there are no homeless people on the lawns of the humanitarian Malibu celebrities, but plenty of security for the very progressives who defunded the police in crime-ridden cities.

Martha’s Vineyard humanitarians blasted ICE as Gestapo thugs, even as they readied care packages for illegal aliens dropped off at their community center—but only after they had ordered buses to transfer the “Other” far away.

Redistributionist gasbag and socialist Hasan Piker—channeling medieval pogroms—warns Jews that their future is bleak in America, then whizzes off in his $200,000 EV Porsche Taycan Turbo S people’s wagon.

So again, what is this plague of modern medievalism?

It is a disease of the 21st-century West, where hundreds of millions have transcended the age-old struggle to live one more day and now enjoy the unchecked freedom and affluence of democratic market capitalism.

In a world where we deem it our birthright to die in our sleep at 90, we do not worry about who struggles to produce our food, build our homes, provide our fuel, or conquer our diseases. We care only that they do so on demand. And thus, on autopilot, we are free to get tatted and pierced, remain glued to our iPhones, and perhaps even consider transitioning as we worry about cosmic things—like the need to celebrate the murderer or torch a police precinct.

Regressive Progressives

So the progressives, socialists, and Marxists gave us universal “caring.” They birthed a puritanical holiness, a narcissistic sanctimoniousness that decrees the rape victim of an illegal alien acceptable collateral damage—allowable to ensure that the illegal alien remains free to enter the country unaudited and unquestioned.

The poor typhus-bearing rats that scurry along the public sidewalk shall not be denied their breeding grounds among the sanctified but soiled and infectious blankets of the homeless.

The modern medievalist demands that the 30-year veteran of our wars be drummed out of the military as an enemy of the people for refusing the experimental mRNA vaccine—but not the COVID-infected, unvaccinated illegal alien who, amid lockdowns, strolls across the Rio Grande without a word from our secular saints.

Virtue-signaling concern for the nihilist—at someone else’s expense—is the new national creed.

And the “victim” and racist killer Decarlos Brown—now deemed “too incompetent to stand trial”—readying his knife to slice open the throat of the innocent, doomed, 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska, in the seat ahead of him, is the poster child of our modern medievalism.

And that, my friends, is the latest elephant in the room.